In a significant observation ahead of the upcoming Bihar elections, the Supreme Court on Monday described the ongoing confusion around the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral roll as primarily a “trust issue.” The court emphasized that political parties must play a proactive role and “activate themselves” to ensure that voters’ concerns are addressed effectively.
A bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi was hearing petitions filed by several political leaders from Bihar. These pleas sought an extension of the September 1 deadline for filing claims and objections to the draft electoral roll published by the Election Commission of India (ECI).
What’s at the Core of the Dispute?
The controversy revolves around the short window provided for citizens to file claims, objections, or corrections to their voter details. Political parties argue that the time allotted by the ECI is insufficient, especially given Bihar’s socio-political complexities and the size of its voter base. They contend that many voters, particularly in rural and marginalized communities, may find it difficult to access information or navigate the online claim and objection system within such a limited timeframe.
Supreme Court’s Balanced Approach
While the Supreme Court refrained from outrightly extending the deadline, it highlighted the critical role political parties must play in bridging the trust gap between voters and the election authorities. Justice Surya Kant observed that the problem is not only procedural but also rooted in a lack of trust between stakeholders.
The court encouraged political parties to mobilize their grassroots workers and volunteers to ensure that genuine voter concerns are documented and submitted in time. This, the bench suggested, would enhance transparency and strengthen public confidence in the electoral process.
Legal Services Authorities to Step In
In an unusual but proactive directive, the Supreme Court requested the Executive Chairman of the Bihar Legal Services Authority to issue instructions to all district Legal Services Authorities (DLSAs). These authorities are to notify para-legal volunteers, along with their names and mobile numbers, by Tuesday noon.
These volunteers will assist voters and political parties in filing claims, objections, or corrections online. This move, the court noted, would act as a safeguard to ensure that no eligible voter is left out due to lack of awareness or technical hurdles.
Why This Matters for Bihar
Elections in Bihar have historically been marked by intense competition and allegations of irregularities in voter rolls. With the state gearing up for another high-stakes contest, ensuring a free, fair, and transparent voter list is crucial. The court’s intervention underscores the importance of electoral integrity in sustaining democracy.
For political parties, the message is clear: election credibility is not solely the responsibility of the Election Commission—it is a collective responsibility. By activating their ground networks and engaging directly with voters, parties can help resolve mistrust and improve participation.
Looking Ahead
As the September 1 deadline stands, it remains to be seen whether the Election Commission or the judiciary will consider granting more time to citizens. What is certain, however, is that the onus now lies on political parties to step up, rebuild voter confidence, and ensure that the electoral process in Bihar remains inclusive and transparent.
The Supreme Court’s call for collaboration between legal authorities, political outfits, and citizens is a reminder that democracy thrives only when all stakeholders work together in good faith.